Home-Page Index Search Free-Stuff Favorites Advertising Contact Casino-Gaming.com
Blackjack Card Counting
All rights reserved.
See also Blackjack Rules & Strategy Video Poker Rules & Strategy
Free Blackjack Card Counting Introduction
Copyright ® 2002 By David Belmonte.
See David's site at
Professional Card Counting
CONTENTS
1. HISTORY OF CARD COUNTING WITH REFERENCE TO MAJOR BLACKJACK PUBLICATIONS
3. RULE VARIATIONS/CUSTOMS WORLDWIDE
No part of this publication may be copied or
reproduced without the prior written consent of the author.
Disclaimer: The Author takes no responsibility for any
losses incurred.
1. HISTORY OF CARD COUNTING WITH REFERENCE TO MAJOR BLACKJACK
PUBLICATIONS
1.1 Roger Baldwin
Baldwin et al’s “The Optimum Strategy in Blackjack” (Baldwin et al, 1956)
appeared in the Journal of the American Statistical Association, in 1956. This
was first ever-published Basic Strategy. Player’s advantage, using this
strategy, was 0.09% (Thorp, 1964.)
1.2 Dr. Edward O. Thorp
Dr. Edward O. Thorp, refined this Basic Strategy, including it in his 1960
“Fortune’s Formula: The Game of Blackjack” paper. Players employing it would
enjoy a 0.13% advantage. Moreover, Thorp presented a winning strategy based on
counting fives. Many interested people offered to finance a test of his Fives
strategy. Two millionaires backed Thorp to the extent of US$10,000. However,
they backed a new strategy developed by Dr. Thorp. Not his “Fives” strategy, but
a more powerful one, based on counting tens. After thirty days, they had won
$11,000. The system “performed in practice just as the theory on which it is
based predicted it would.” (Thorp, 1964.)
Dr. Thorp revealed all the aforementioned strategies he developed in his Beat
The Dealer book, first published in 1962. It sold over 500,000 copies. This book
would change the course of blackjack history forever.
1.3 Lawrence Revere
In 1969, legendary Lawrence Revere’s book, Playing Blackjack as A Business, was
published. He improved Thorp’s Basic Strategy. Presenting his Revere Five Count,
Plus-Minus, Ten Count and Revere Point Count. The latter, was the most advanced
card counting strategy available in all the literature, at that time. His book
was unquestionably accurate and reliable, re-published in eight revisions. (Most
recently in 1998.) Lawrence Revere won consistently playing Blackjack,
eventually permanently excluded from every gambling casino in Nevada. Mr. Revere
died in 1977, but remains unforgotten. His contribution was significant.
1.4 Professor Peter A. Griffin
Professor Peter A. Griffin also contributed substantially to the theory of card
counting. His book, The Theory of Blackjack, remains the most advanced blackjack
book ever written. (First published in 1979.) It is mathematically complex; yet
highly useful for anyone. His elucidation of the mathematics of Blackjack, from
card counting to playing multiple decks, rule variations, to consequences of
card counting errors, are extremely accurate. He was the first to ascertain the
overall casino advantage against typical Blackjack players. His book underwent
four revisions. Mr. Griffin died in 1997.
1.5 Ken Uston
Ken Uston was another prolific figure, employing newly sophisticated card
counting techniques, winning consistently. He disclosed his team methods, in
minutia, in his book, Million Dollar Blackjack, first published in 1981. Players
could individually modify a team approach, as detailed in Uston’s book, to
arouse minimal suspicion. Furthermore, each individual team member’s income
would be greater, by playing in a team, than playing alone. Thus, little
suspicion and greater profits ensured the team approach remained widespread and
popular. Additionally, Uston’s Advanced Point Count was one of the most powerful
card counting strategies. He revealed it in his book. Mr. Uston further
confronted Atlantic City casinos, by means of professional legal representation
in court. The outcome was favorable for card counters. All were now legally
entitled to play in Atlantic City casinos, without exclusion. This, of course,
was significant.
® David Belmonte
2. CARD COUNTING
2.1 Basic Strategy
This is a set of rules governing when to take a card, split a pair (into two
separate hands), double down (doubling size of initial bet, receiving only one
additional card,) etc. This is very important. What you do depends on your hand
and importantly, on what the dealer holds. For example, the dealer is very
likely to bust (exceed total of 21) holding a 5. Therefore, if the player held
16, he would stand (not take a card.) However, if the dealer had a 10, he would
be likely to make a hand. Therefore, holding 16, you would hit (take a card).
One uses the Basic Strategy over 80% of the time. If one cannot accurately
determine how to play each hand, then he becomes ineffective. Therefore,
memorizing the Basic Strategy is essential for any aspiring card counter.
2.2 Underlying Principle of All Card Counting Strategies
A value is assigned to each card. Plus, minus or zero. Consider the following
well-known card counting strategy:
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
X |
Ace |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
Cards two through seven are assigned a value of plus one, seven to nine count as
zero and all ten value cards and Aces count as minus one. Thus if a 2, 3, and X
(ten value card) appeared, our count would be +1. We continue adding subtracting
card values as each card appears, on the table. This “running count”, can then
be used to ascertain approximate percentage advantage, at any time. When we have
an advantage (+ counts) we bet high; disadvantageous times, we bet low (-
counts.) We may only have an advantage of 2% or more, just 10 out of every 100
hands. Disadvantage, of about 0.5%, for the remaining 90 hands.
Suppose our low bets are $10, large bets are $60.
Then:
In each hour we lose 0.005 x 90 x
$10, or $4.5 on unfavorable situations.
In each hour we gain 0.02 x 10 x $60, or $12 on favorable situations.
Thus, our net profit becomes $7.5 per hour, receiving 100 hands per hour. Of
course, we would win more, if we bet higher.
® David Belmonte
3. RULE
VARIATIONS/CUSTOMS WORLDWIDE
Advancement in card counting theory and increased sophistication necessitated
important changes in Blackjack, at gambling casinos throughout the world. Las
Vegas Blackjack rules and deck penetration is generally better than casinos
anywhere else. Additionally, one has many outlets to choose from, in Las Vegas.
There proprietors offer single and double-deck games. Most other countries
however, only offer four, five, six or eight deck games. (Except Macao.)
Although multiple deck games are inherently more disadvantageous, one can still
find attractive playing opportunities. Consider a casino offering a six-deck
game. Players may only double down on totals of 9, 10 and 11, may double down
after splitting. Casino offers insurance and dealer must stand on soft 17.
Further, the cut card is inserted one deck from the back of the shoe. This set
of conditions exists in certain casinos outside USA. They are very attractive.
Thus, despite introduction by casinos worldwide of multiple decks, to combat
counters, the playing conditions are still favorable.
4. CASINO COUNTERMEASURES
4.1 Shuffling Up
Casinos worldwide dealing single double or multiple deck games may shuffle the
deck(s) before the cut or burn card. If supervisors suspect a player of card
counting, they may “shuffle-up” on him without warning, (even after just several
rounds have been dealt.) Counters enjoying an advantageous situation, betting
high may suddenly find this premature shuffling destroys it. The successful
counter avoids the shuffling countermeasure by remaining undetected. He may
visit the casino infrequently, playing during different shifts, camouflage his
betting, adopt an “act”, etc.
4.2 Reduce Player’s Bet Size
Advantages in Blackjack are so rare that, when they occur, card counters must
bet large. However, supervisory staff may simply disallow the counter to place
high bets. Thus, he has little potential to make a profit. Again, arousing
minimal suspicion is essential, so that you never encounter such
countermeasures.
® David Belmonte
4.3 Permanent
Exclusion
If a casino perceives that a particular Blackjack player’s card counting
effectiveness poses a threat to their continued financial well being, they may
simply exclude him permanently from the casino. (Known also as “barring”.)
However, tactics to avoid this problem exist. Players barred, can simply play at
any one of hundreds of other casinos available, also.
4.4 Cut Card Placement
Alternatively, casinos using multiple decks in Blackjack can eliminate a
counter’s potential profit by inserting the card close to the front of the shoe.
Ordinarily, dealers insert the cut card anywhere from 50% to 75% from the front.
However, inserting the card just 30% from the front, makes consistent wins from
the card counter extremely difficult! His advantages arise most frequently
towards the end of the shoe. Without the opportunity to capitalize on these
(usually) high advantages, his profit, dwindles. One may seek another casino if
confronted with this countermeasure, play infrequently to be undetected, or
adopt an “act”, etc.
5. REFERENCES
Baldwin, Cantey, Maisel, and McDermott. 1956. “The Optimum Strategy in
Blackjack”. Journal of the American Statistical Association. Vol. 51.
Griffin P. 1996. The Theory of Blackjack: The Compleat Card Counter’s Guide to
the Casino Game of 21. Las Vegas: Huntington Press.
Revere L. 1998. Playing Blackjack As a Business. Secausus: Carol Publishing
Group.
Thorp. E. O. 1964. Beat The Dealer. New York: Vintage Books.
Uston K. 1981. Million Dollar Blackjack. Secausus: Carol Publishing Group.
® David Belmonte
Compliments of Casino-Gaming.com